Next: Design of controllers using
Up: PID control and associated
Previous: Advantages and disadvantages of
  Contents
Empirical tuning rules according to Ziegler and
Nichols
Many industrial processes show step responses with pure aperiodic
behaviour according to
Figure 8.6. This S-shape curve is characteristic of
many high-order systems and such plant transfer functions may be approximated
by the
mathematical model
 |
(8.15) |
which contains a 1st-order delay element and a dead time.
Figure 8.6 shows the
approximation
by a
element.
Figure 8.6:
Describing the step response of a process
by the three characteristic values
(gain of the plant),
(rise time) and
(delay time)
 |
Here the step response is characterised by constructing the
tangent at the turning point
with the
following three values:
(
gain of the plant),
(rise time) and
(delay time). Then a rough approximation
according to Eq. (8.15) is to set
and
.
For a plant of the type described above a lot of tuning rules for
standard controllers have been developed. These have been mostly
developed empirically from simulation studies. The most famous
empirical tuning rules are those of Ziegler and Nichols. These tuning rules have been derived to provide step
responses for the closed loop, where the response shows a decrease
of the amplitude of approx. 25% per period. For the application
of these rules according to Ziegler and Nichols two different
approaches can be used:
- a)
- Method
of the stability margin(I): Here, the following steps are
used:
- The controller is switched to pure P action.
- The gain
of the P controller is continuously increased until the
closed loop shows permanent oscillations. The value of the gain
at this state is denoted as the critical
controller gain
.
- The length of period
(critical period) of the
oscillations is measured.
- From
and
one determines the
controller tuning values
,
and
using the formulas given in Table 8.1.
- b)
- Method
of the step response (II): In the case of an industrial plant it
is often not possible, suitable or allowed to drive the plant into
permanent oscillations for
determining
and
. Measuring the
step response of
the plant does not generally cause difficulties. Therefore, in
many cases the second form of the Ziegler-Nichols approach is more
expedient. The rules are based directly on the slope
of the tangent at the turning point and on the
delay
of the step response. One has to observe that the
measurement of the step response needs only to be taken at the turning
point T, as the slope of the tangent already describes the ratio
. Using the measured data
and
as well as the formula given in
Table 8.1 the controller tuning parameters can be
determined by simple calculations.
Table 8.1:
Controller tuning parameters according to Ziegler and Nichols
| |
Next: Design of controllers using
Up: PID control and associated
Previous: Advantages and disadvantages of
  Contents
Christian Schmid 2005-05-09